Outcome in Patients with Trochanteric and Subtrochanteric Femoral Fractures Aspects on Surgical Methods, Quality of Life and Cognitive Function
نویسنده
چکیده
...............................................................................................................3 List of papers........................................................................................................4 List of abbreviations ............................................................................................5 Introduction..........................................................................................................6 Historical background ..................................................................................6 History of hip fracture research at Södersjukhuset......................................7 Epidemiology................................................................................................7 Classification ................................................................................................8 Evolution of internal fixation .....................................................................12 Assessment of outcome..............................................................................19 Cognitive function ......................................................................................20 Stating the problem.....................................................................................20 Aims of the studies.............................................................................................22 Patients ...............................................................................................................23 Ethics...........................................................................................................23 Inclusion criteria and follow-up.................................................................23 Methods..............................................................................................................25 Age and gender...........................................................................................25 Fracture classification.................................................................................25 Co-morbidity...............................................................................................25 Randomisation............................................................................................26 Cognitive function ......................................................................................26 ADL ............................................................................................................26 Preoperative walking ability.......................................................................26 Living conditions........................................................................................26 Treatment modalities ..................................................................................27 Perioperative data .......................................................................................27 Complications.............................................................................................28 Radiological assessment.............................................................................28 Assessment of clinical outcome.................................................................29 Statistical methods......................................................................................32 Results ................................................................................................................33 Study I.........................................................................................................33 Study II .......................................................................................................37 Study III ......................................................................................................40 Study IV......................................................................................................44 Study V .......................................................................................................47 General discussion .............................................................................................51 Failure rates and reoperation rates .............................................................51 Fracture healing complications ..................................................................53 Wound infections........................................................................................54 Femoral shaft fractures...............................................................................55 Salvage procedures.....................................................................................56 Surgical technique ......................................................................................56 Hip function ................................................................................................57
منابع مشابه
The standard Gamma nail or the Medoff sliding plate for unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. A randomised, controlled trial.
We studied 217 patients with an unstable trochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture who had been randomly allocated to treatment by either internal fixation with a standard Gamma nail (SGN) or a Medoff sliding plate (MSP, biaxial dynamisation mode). Their mean age was 84 years (65 to 99) and they were reviewed at four and 12 months after surgery. Assessments of outcome included general complicati...
متن کاملIntertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures outcome on surgery
Background: Intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures are leading cause of hospital admissions in elderly people. Aim: This study was done to analyze the surgical management of proximal third fractures of femur using Proximal Femoral Nail fixation. Materials and methods: 20 cases there were 15 male and 5 female patients of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures, which were treate...
متن کاملSurgical Management Of Proximal Femur Fractures By Proximal Femoral Nail
Background and Objectives: Proximal third fractures of femur like intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures, are a leading cause of hospital admissions in elderly people. The number of such admissions is on a raise because of increasing life span and sedentary habits. Conservative methods of treatment results in malunion with shortening and limitation of hip movement as well as complicati...
متن کاملSubtrochanteric Femoral Fracture during Trochanteric Nailing for the Treatment of Femoral Shaft Fracture
We report on three cases of subtrochanteric femoral fractures during trochanteric intramedullary nailing for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures. Trochanteric intramedullary nails, which have a proximal lateral bend, are specifically designed for trochanteric insertion. When combined with the modified insertion technique, trochanteric intramedullary nails reduce iatrogenic fracture comminu...
متن کاملType II Intertrochanteric Fractures: Proximal Femoral Nailing (PFN) Versus Dynamic Hip Screw(DHS)
Background: Intertrochanteric fracture is one of the most common fractures of the hip especially in the elderly with osteoporotic bones, usually due to low-energy trauma like simple falls. Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) is still considered the gold standard for treating intertrochanteric fractures by many. Not many studies compare the DHS with Proximal femoral nail (PFN), in Type II intertrochanteri...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011